Why GPU-acceleration makes sense
Why GPU-acceleration makes sense#
In this notebook we demonstrate speedup through GPU-acceleration using a Gaussian blur filter. We’ll be using the clEsperanto library which uses OpenCL and is compatible to a wide range of Intel, AMD and NVidia GPUs. Feel free to run it on your GPU and measure the speedup!
Note: benchmarking results vary heavily depending on image size, kernel size, used operations, parameters and used hardware. Use this notebook to adapt it to your use-case scenario and benchmark on your target hardware. If you have different scenarios or use-cases, you are very welcome to submit your notebook as pull-request!
import pyclesperanto_prototype as cle from skimage import filters import time # to measure kernel execution duration properly, we need to set this flag. It will slow down exection of workflows a bit though cle.set_wait_for_kernel_finish(True) # selet a GPU with the following in the name. This will fallback to any other GPU if none with this name is found cle.select_device('RTX')
<GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Platform: NVIDIA CUDA (1 refs)>
# test data import numpy as np from skimage.io import imread test_image = imread('Lund_000500_resampled-cropped.tif') sigma = 10
# convolve with scikit-image result_image = None for i in range(0, 10): start_time = time.time() result_image = filters.gaussian(test_image, output=result_image, sigma=sigma) print("skimage Gaussian duration: " + str(time.time() - start_time))
skimage Gaussian duration: 0.644662618637085 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.63631272315979 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6193966865539551 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6499156951904297 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6301307678222656 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6531178951263428 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6489198207855225 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.6308994293212891 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.7410404682159424 skimage Gaussian duration: 0.8148434162139893
# convolve with pyclesperanto result_image_gpu = None test_image_gpu = cle.push(test_image) for i in range(0, 10): start_time = time.time() result_image_gpu = cle.gaussian_blur(test_image_gpu, result_image_gpu, sigma_x=sigma, sigma_y=sigma, sigma_z=sigma) print("pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: " + str(time.time() - start_time))
pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.026170730590820312 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.002056121826171875 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.015659093856811523 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.019225597381591797 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.01566314697265625 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.015616178512573242 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.01566910743713379 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.015576839447021484 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.01562190055847168 pyclesperanto Gaussian duration: 0.023794889450073242
Let’s just check if the results look similar
import napari viewer = napari.Viewer() napari.run()
viewer.add_image(test_image) viewer.add_image(result_image) viewer.add_image(result_image_gpu)
<Image layer 'result_image_gpu' at 0x1d3b659c460>